top of page

30 Seconds Of Therapy: Use AFOs for Tibial Control

Jul 23

4 min read

0

10

0

Person holding the lower leg and ankle with visible redness, indicating pain or inflammation in the distal tibia and ankle joint area.
The ankle is the joint connecting the foot and lower leg, enabling movement and bearing weight. It's made up of bones, cartilage, ligaments, muscles, and nerves. Ankle injuries, like sprains and fractures, are common, especially in sports and everyday activities. 


START


  1. Start With the Tibia in Your Gait Analysis

    1. The tibia plays a leading role during the stance phase, which makes up 60% of the gait cycle— with single-limb support (SLS) being the most mechanically demanding portion.

      1. During mid-stance, the ankle must achieve 10° dorsiflexion, while the tibia advances over the foot to support 70% of body weight (the HAT segment + pelvis).

      2. If tibial control fails here, compensations cascade upward—knee collapse, hip instability, and trunk sway.


  2. Prescribing AFOs to Manage Tibial Instability

    1. Contrary to popular belief, the primary purpose of an AFO is to improve distal stance stability, not just prevent toe drag.

      1. An AFO helps maintain the tibia in an upright, aligned position—especially critical during mid and terminal stance, when plantar flexors are active to stabilize and propel.

      2. AFOs reduce energy cost and improve walking efficiency in patients.


  3.  Addressing Proximal Issues as Secondary

    1. Hip or quad overactivity is often secondary to tibial collapse.

      1. For example, if plantar flexors are weak and the tibia collapses forward, the quads must stay active to prevent knee buckling, even though they’re typically quiet during mid-stance (EMG confirms this).

      2. By restoring tibial alignment, you restore natural muscle recruitment and reduce compensatory overuse.



STOP


  1. Treating Swing Issues Without Fixing Stance

    1. If you’re only addressing foot drag, you’re missing the origin.

      1. 40° of the needed 60° knee flexion in swing occurs passively during pre-swing, which is dependent on proper tibial alignment on the contralateral stance side.


  2. Believing That “Foot Drop” Is the Core Problem

    1. Most swing limitations stem from proximal issues—inadequate knee or hip flexion—not ankle dorsiflexion.

      1. In fact, during swing, the ankle only needs to reach neutral (0° dorsiflexion) for limb clearance.

  3. Attributing Crouch Gait to Weak Quads

    1. A crouched knee during stance is not always a quad issue. If the plantar flexors are weak, the tibia collapses forward into dorsiflexion, requiring the quads to engage just to keep upright.

      1. Fixing tibial stability solves the actual problem—not just the symptom.



WHY


  1. Why prioritize tibial stability in gait rehab?

    1. Because the tibia governs efficient weight acceptance and forward propulsion. Its alignment determines how the knee, hip, and trunk respond during gait. When it collapses, the whole system compensates—leading to poor movement economy, fatigue, and limited functional capacity. Stabilizing the tibia improves efficiency and performance across the entire kinetic chain.


  2.  Why use AFOs for stance support—not swing assistance?

    1.  Because the greatest dysfunction occurs during stance, not swing.  An AFO that provides proper tibial alignment enables controlled movement through the heel rocker → ankle rocker → forefoot rocker, which are critical for efficient gait.



Download PDF Ankle Exercises



References: MedBridge More Than Just an AFO Part 1: Mechanics, Function, and Common Myths Andrea Ecsedy, PT, DPT, NCS MedBridge More Than Just an AFO Part 2: Common Deviations and Solutions Andrea Ecsedy, PT, DPT, NCS 1. Perry J, Burnfield JM. Gait Analysis: Normal and Pathological Function. Second edition. SLACK Inc. 2010. Chapters 1-4. 2. Adams JM, Cerny K. Observational Gait analysis: A Visual Guide . SLACK Inc. 2018. 3. The Pathokinesiology Service and Physical Therapy Department. Observational Gait Analysis 4th edition. Los Amigos Research and Education Institute, 2001. 4. Bowers R. Biomechanical Basis for use of ankle-foot orthoses after stroke. BJNN/Stroke Association 2013 Dec.: Stroke Association Supplement Pages 20-24. 5. Corcoran PJ, Jebsen RH et al. Effects of Plastic and metal leg braces on speed and energy cost of hemiparetic ambulation. Arch Phys Med Rehab 1970;51(2):69-77. 6. Noriaki M, Kato J, Azuma Y et al. Energy expenditure and walking ability in stroke patients: Their improvement by ankle-foot orthoses. Isokinetics and Ex Sci 2019;17:57- 62. 7. Keikburun S, Yavuz F et al.Effect of ankle-foot orthosis on gait parameters and functional ambulation in a patients with stroke. Turk J Phys Med Rehab 2017;63(2):143- 148. 8. Nolan KJ, Savalia KK et al. Objective assessment of functional ambulation in adults with hemiplegia using ankle foot orthotics after stroke. PM&R 2009;1:524-9. 9. Rao N, Aruin AS. Role of ankle foot orthoses in functional stability of individuals with stroke. Disab & Rehabil Assitive Tech 2016;11(7):595-598 10. Dogan A, Mengulluoglu M, Ozgirgin N. Evaluation of the effect of ankle– foot orthosis use on balance and mobility in hemiparetic stroke patients. Disabil Rehabil 2011:33:1433-9. 11. Nadeau S, Gravel D, Arsenault AB et al. Plantar flexors weakness as a limiting factore of gait speed in stroke subjects and the compensating role of hip flexors. Clin Biomech 1999 Feb ; 14(2):125-35. 12. Singer ML, Kobayashi T, Lincoln LS et l. The effect of ankle-foot orthosis plantar flexion stiffness on ankle and knee joint kinematics and kinetics during first and second rockers of gait in individuals with stroke. Clin Biomech 2014 Nov. 29(9):1077-1080. 13. Lee HY, Lee HJ, Kim K. Changes in angular kinematics of the paretic lower limb at different orthotic angles of plantar flexion limitation of ankle- foot-orthosis for stroke patients. J. Phys Ther Sci 2015;27:825-828.


Related Posts

Comments

Share Your ThoughtsBe the first to write a comment.
bottom of page